We worked last night and
were fast asleep during the upset victory by the team that plays in New Jersey
but is called the New York Giants. We like the Super Bowl because at its
end we know that we are little closer to the day when pitcher and catchers
report. But we are interested in the results in the score pool at the
Dutch Tavern. We'll find out today at about noon if we won five big
ones. Now that would be an upset.
UPDATE: We didn't
win. Now, if our candidate wins today, that will be some consolation.
UPDATE: Well, yes,
our candidate did win but also lost. Such is life.
Pitchers and catchers still will be playing in the next two weeks and we can't
wait.
Two encounters with
government: the Postal Service and the Connecticut Department of Revenue
Services
We went to the post office in
New London for our mail. The box is 1841 and we had two pieces of
mail. One was junk which we put into the recycling bin. The second
was what appeared to be a form letter from Greenville, South
Carolina. We didn't open it because it wasn't address to us.
It was address to a woman who also lived in Greenville, South Carolina.
We don't think we've a lot in common with the woman in South Carolina although
we might. What we do have in common is the Post Office Box 1841.
Our box is in New London, Connecticut. Her box is in Greenville, South
Carolina. That is where the similarity ends, so far as we
know. We gave the letter to man at the window who said he would send it
back down to South Carolina. It was a computer mistake, he said. We
wondered how much of our mail has ended up at P.O. Box 1841, Fargo, North
Dakota or elsewhere. They can have the bills, but please forward the
checks.
We filed our 2006 Connecticut
Income taxes on April 15, 2007. We had over paid the good folks at the
Connecticut Department of Revenue Services and we were due a refund of $114 or
that's what we figured. While not a great amount, a hundred bucks is a
hundred bucks. As the months went by and the check didn't show up,
we thought we had made a mistake on our return and expected an audit letter or
other such worrisome notice. On January 23, 2008 we received a
letter from the department. Opening it with some trepidation, there was
our refund of $114 for our 2006 taxes . The check was dated January 17,
2008 or nine months after we filed our return.
Perhaps next year we should
contact the lady in South Carolina to see if she has our money.
Yes, things are just smooth as
silk here in America. At least the numbers of people running for
president is getting down to a more manageable size.
Peter J. Roberts
So, now it is a
horserace. But think about this,
One of the two major
political parties in the United States currently has two frontrunners for its
nomination for president. One is a black man and the other is a white
women. That's a start on making history.
As we said before the
vote in New Hampshire
And now the Granit State
It will be warm today in New
Hampshire as it will all over New England. We don't believe today's warm
temperatures are a direct link to global warming but they could. We know
that one or two or ever a few warm days do not make for a season or a weather
age, but they could. The warm days could be nothing more than a
modest aberration, meaning less and less, measured over time.
Many people in New Hampshire
will vote today. We're told that, like the temperatures, the turn out
will above the norm. We know a little more about people than we do
the weather-or we like to think we do-but the increase in turn out might be
related to the increase in temperatures and good January weather.
Another, modest aberration on a human scale. Placed on the history books,
it may be just another year in a string of predictable votes held in the Granit
State every four years.
Or it might be something different.
It might be the melting of the ice that has frozen the republic and our
politics for more than a decade. It is possible that our long Ice Age is
coming to an end, drop by drop and vote by vote.
Peter J. Roberts
Mike Huckabee and a few
others running for office should do some Carl Sagan
We were shopping at our favorite
store, the Salvation Army Thrift Shop in downtown, when we discovered a complete set of
the Carl Sagan TV program Cosmos. It is a little dated but still
rings true and is wonderful to watch again.
Sagan was one of our few heroes
who died far too young in 1996. He was gentle, literate astronomer who
brought the vastness of the universe into our living rooms and, more important,
into our minds. It was he that taught us that we are all star
stuff. We're all linked to the soup of the infinite.
So when we hear Mr. Huckabee
and others put down the facts of science for their own political and religious
reasons, we want to sit him and them down in our living room to watch Cosmos
and listen to the late, great Carl Sagan. They could do worse.
They could also visit The Carl Sagan Portal
and The Planetary Society, founded
in 1980 by Carl
Sagan.
News Flash
2008 cancelled
2009 starts on what was to have been January 1, 2008
|
Bush has less than a
month in office as a grateful nation waits
Rush Limbaugh confirms sex change
operation. Dido heads urged to tune in the Rose Limbaugh Program.
Huckabee concedes the earth may be more than 100
years old but demands real proof.
The 2012 presidential campaign
heats up. Jeb Bush tours New Hampshire.
Al Gore named president of the world.
Jenna
Bush enters convent. (they make wine)
Laura Bush teaches George to
a big read. (no ex-president left behind)
Major League Baseball
turns down naming rights for Pfizer Stadium
Britney Spears is
Britney Spears. Seeks Stadium Naming.
New England Patriots
lose game.
NewenglandWOW.com
bought by Bill Gates.
|
Boy did we screw up.
We were tempted many times
to plunge, BIG TIME, into real estate but we didn't. We thought that all
the mail and emails we received from lenders sounded a little too good to be
true. Most of them started, as they still do, with Don't miss
out on the boom, or Here's your chance to make real money in real
estate. And the thing that worried us was the idea that they
were willing to lend us hundreds of thousand of dollars without us putting up
any money or them having any idea of just how much we could afford to
spend on this big opportunity. So we didn't. We're still right
where we were before the real estate boom.
But now we're learning that
all the folks to took the plunge, BIG TIME, into real estate, and are looking
to loose their shirt, among other things, may get a free ride. The Bush administration,
with the help from some financial sharpies, has come up with a plan to cut the
folks, and the folks who lent them money in the first place, some slack.
It's a win/win for everyone, except for some of us who didn't take the come-on
in the first place.
No, we don't want more
homeless people. We've too many already. But we do think that the bankers, brokers, investors and financiers who profited to the
tune of hundreds of billions of dollars should be put out onto the street to
see how it feels.
Our second play
Last spring we submitted
our first play to the Temple
Players of Stratford, Connecticut for their one act festival, A Biblical
Sense of Humor. Our play, Job's Job Interview won, was produced
along with six other, one-act plays in the festival.
Inspired by this success,
and with more time on our hands than we should, our next play is ready for
reading and we hope, production sometime early next year. We are looking
for actors in the New London area to perform a staged reading in December or
early January.
The play, Furniture,
is on the internet, with a few typos and always subject to
revisions. It calls for five actors, one of whom plays a
desk. We'll let you figure it out from there.
Comments,
kind and unkind, are welcome.
Washington, D.C.
October 3, 1863
By the President of the United States of
America.
A Proclamation
The year that is drawing towards its
close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful
skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to
forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so
extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the
heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of
Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity,
which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and to provoke their
aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been
maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed
everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has
been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union.
Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful
industry to the national defense, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle or
the ship; the axe has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines,
as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more
abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding
the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and
the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is
permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.
No human counsel hath devised nor hath any
mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the
Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath
nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they
should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart
and one voice by the whole American People.
I do therefore invite my fellow citizens
in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who
are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of
November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who
dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the
ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings,
they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and
disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows,
orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are
unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty
Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be
consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility
and Union.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set
my hand and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the City of Washington, this Third
day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and
sixty-three, and of the Independence of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.
By the President: Abraham Lincoln
Another nail in the
coffin of Western Civilization
According to press reports,
baseball's general managers voted 25-5 to allow instant replays, at least for
now, to judge home runs. The move still must be approved by the
clubs, players and umpires among others.
What's next; cheerleaders
and pom-poms?
The board of Merrill Lynch
announced that E. Stanley O’Neal, chairman and chief executive of Merrill
Lynch, stepped down from the brokerage firm today. Mr. O’Neal would
retire immediately. According
to news reports, Mr. O’Neal is expected to receive at least $159 million in
severance and retirement.
I'm available. Heck, a
month or two on the job, and I'm set.
You could do worse.
Peter J. Roberts
NewenglandWOW.com
The
Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2007 is to
be shared, in two equal parts, between the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) and Albert Arnold (Al) Gore Jr.
for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made
climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to
counteract such change. The
Official Web Site of the Norwegian Nobel Institute
If Al Gore can have this
kind of influence for good as a private citizen, we wonder what things would
have been like had he been president. We're a Supreme Court late on
answering that question, but we think it is well worth pondering.
Congratulations to Mr. Gore
on a recognition that is nearly eight years too late for him. We hope it
is not too late for us.
Peter J. Roberts
A
heart beat for the GOP? Or just an aberration?
There
is a congressman by the name of Ron Paul who running for the republican
nomination for president. He has no chance what-so-ever. He is a doctor
and according to his bio, the Texas republican has delivered over 4,000
babies. That's a lot of babies. He is also the only
republican candidate who was and is opposed to the war in Iraq. Lately he
has stunned republican party leaders by raising over $ 5 million in the last
three months, mostly in small contributions.
The
war in Iraq was sold to us with false information. The area is more dangerous
now than when we entered it. We destroyed a regime hated by our direct enemies,
the jihadists, and created thousands of new recruits for them. This war has
cost more than 3,000 American lives, thousands of seriously wounded, and
hundreds of billions of dollars. We must have new leadership in the White House
to ensure this never happens again. From War
and Foreign Policy, Ron Paul 2008
We
take some heart from the knowledge that not all party members are marching in
lock steep with the foolish ones now contending for the republican
nomination. Perhaps it is indeed, David's time with the sling.
Congressman
Paul, we wish you luck. Your courage, at that of many others, may yet
save our republic.
Peter
J. Roberts
Health
Care hits home...again!
A
week and a half ago I got cut on. It was done by a doctor, in a hospital
and I was invited to stay the night. I did. While the
operation was not for any life threatening ailment and the area of concern is
not normally visible to me, let alone to others, the condition had progressed
to the point where an operation was called for. And that's the point.
I
could have opted out of the operation and still gone about my daily life at home and
at work. I would have been in pain or at least considerable discomfort,
but I could have kept on. There would have been some things I would have
avoided-riding a bicycle, attending a long meeting or going to church (pews are
not designed for comfort, especially the ones without cushions. It has
something to do with sacrifice.) but I could have "lived" without the
operation. But instead of living poorly I took the option to improve my
health. (This aspect I'm still waiting for although progress,
I'm told, is apparent. I haven't looked and don't want to.)
I
had the operation for two reasons. First, it was deemed necessary. Second, I
had health insurance to cover a considerable amount of the
expenses. It's going to total out at a few grand and like most
folks, we just don't have an extra few c-notes sitting around for medical
expenses.
Which
naturally suggests the topic of health care in America. After providing
for shelter and with the exception of sending young people to college-another
important issue-providing some sort of health care, any sort of health care, is
the most expensive things we Americans do with our money, or more candidly, our
ability to go into debt.
Is
this how we want to run our country and care for our people? Some think
things are just fine and maybe, from their view from the hospital bed, things
are. But for all too many Americans, having health insurance is
like owning a prized antique that's been passed from one generation to another. Others
look on it with envy and wish they had been so fortunate.
President
Bush recently suggested that the health care system in America was fine since
anyone could go to the emergency room. That of course assumes there's one
that people can get to; that the hospital with the emergency room accepts
everyone; that the health providers are willing to take the loss on a poor
patient and finally, that the condition was truly an emergency. In my
case, the latter didn't apply, as it does for ten of millions of other
Americans. Under our present system, I would have been out of luck.
If
one values health care as a service for everyone, regardless of the ability to
pay, health care in America is a sham.
There
is absolutely no other reality-based conclusion that one can make.
Peter
J. Roberts
On
August 19, 2007 we read a moving and well thought-out Op-Ed piece in the New
York Times by seven soldiers stationed in Iraq. The
War as We Saw It was written from the point of view the lower
ranks in the Army-no charts or graphs-but simply expressed candid view of war
by some of the people who were actually fighting it. The soldiers, none
above the rank of staff sergeant, were assigned to the 82nd Airborne
Division.
On Monday, September 10, while
most of official Washington was considering the finer points of the
"serge" and just how long we will be at war in the country, two of
the soldiers who wrote the piece, Staff Sgt. Yance T. Gray, 26, and Sgt. Omar
Mora, 28 were killed while on duty in the war. The details of their
deaths was printed on the Time's Op-Ed page 2
G.I.’s, Skeptical but Loyal, Die in a Truck Crash in Iraq on
September 13, 2007.
Some
should stick to acting. Some should stick to holding office.
Others should stick to just running for office or acting. Another
boob tube master for the White House! We've got one now.
Please, history does not need to repeat itself so darn soon. Life, real
life, is way too short.
Health
care hitting home
We're not sick or ill
but we do have a problem with our anatomy. While not going into details,
suffice it to say that in the early part of September we will the object of a
surgeon's tools of the trade. We will report early to the hospital,
after starving for at least twelve hours, and will go under the knife.
We've been told that we should expect to stay the night, which is rather unusual
these days.
We of course played by
the rules, as we understood them, in getting health care for our problem.
We went first to our primary care physician. He took a look, poked
around and wrote our a few prescriptions. He also said we need to see the
surgeon and that his office would make the appointment. We have
been down this road before but knew that had we called the surgeon first, then
the insurance people would have been very upset and might have said to us,
"if you want to see the high-priced guy, go right ahead, but you pay for
it."
We figure the bill, or
rather the bills, will come to a few grand. There's the guy with the
knife. Someone, we hope will be near by to assist him and the chap who is
going to put us to sleep while our privates are on display for all the world to
see. Then there is the recovery room, the machines that we'll be hooked up
to before, during and after all this is going on and bunk and room they will
take us to after the operation. Again, this is very minor surgery but a
few thousand dollars is a conservative estimate of what this will cost.
Well, we do have
health insurance but it is by no means free ride. We will have to pay a
certain percentage of the bill or bills and that's where the worry comes in.
In all candor and despite going over all the clauses of our insurance policy,
we've no real idea of just how much all this is going to cost. Not a clue.
So in early September
we're going to hope for the best of two counts....that our surgeon had a good
nights rest and that when our part of the bills hits the mail box, we will still
be able to eat with the lights on for the rest of the year.
Peter J. Roberts
And
the walls came tumbling down
From the Congressional Budget
Office comes: Testimony
on Estimated Costs of U.S. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and of Other
Activities Related to the War on Terrorism
Since September 2001, the Congress has appropriated $602
billion for
military operations and other activities related to Iraq, Afghanistan, and the
war on terrorism. In addition, although not explicitly appropriated for that
purpose, an estimated $2 billion has been spent by the VA for war-related
benefits. Specific
appropriations, which averaged about $93 billion a year from 2003 through 2005,
have risen to $120 billion in 2006 and $170 billion in 2007.
The report, as these things
go, is usually brief. We'll not make the connection with the bridge
failure in Minneapolis, except to note that no where have we read a report
praising the condition of this nation's infrastructure. We do
suggest that what has been spent already on the war in Iraq would be but a down payment
on fixing America.
Have
we squandered the trust placed in us?
New England as a
place for people has been around for a few thousand years. It's only been
in the last three hundred or so that we call it New England and for good
or ill, the name has been passed down to us by the millions who lived here
before us. While much of course has changed, again for good or ill, there
is still something special about our region and its people. We can thank
those who came before us, natives and immigrants, for what they passed on
us. Our history, traditions, culture and the grand variety of
"places" that are New England were given or entrusted, to us who live
here today. Some no doubt, gave us scant thought while others kept
us in the forefront of their efforts to make New England.
It is the height
of summer and the forecast is for more hot and humid weather.
This is not a surprise. We expect hot and humid days in July as we expect
cold, snowy ones in January. This is the way things are in New England
for us and for the millions who came before.
But perhaps not
for the New Englanders who will follow us. We may not pass on the grand
variety that is New England and if we don't, it will be largely our
fault. We will have squandered the trust placed in us.
Until recently
we had some luxury in accepting the blame. The damage, if any, was
generations away, so the thinking went, and by then they would have the
technology and smarts to fix it. We figured that the year 2207 would take
care of itself. We were off the hook, or so we thought.
Not
anymore. Global warming is real and it is happening right now in New
England. Children growing up today in Maine will not live in the
same wonderful place that we hold so dear. The same will be true
for children living in Green Mountains of Vermont, the coastal cities and towns
of Connecticut, Rhode Island and New Hampshire or the farming county of
interior New England. Our entire region and every place in it will be different.
So will Long Island Sound, our coastal bays and the Atlantic Ocean.
And the changes
are not likely to be for the better. That's the report issued
on July 8, 2007 by the Union
of Concerned Scientists. The Union has been researching and
reporting on climate change for decades as have many other professional
scientific organizations. While there are still a few
who think all the "talk" about global warming is just that, the vast
majority of the scientific community has come to accept the facts of increased
air and sea temperatures and an equally significant majority of this community accepts
the facts of human activity in promoting these temperature increases.
Everyone-you, me, your family, my family, all of us-is causing the
problem.
The finding of the report, Global
Warming Will Hit U.S. Northeast Hard Unless Action Taken Now doesn't
pull any punches and makes it all too clear that we, all of us, are very much
on the hook.
We face a choice.
We can work now, today, to stop our greedy and wasteful ways and help pass on
the New England that was given to us. If we don't, we should all take a
last glance at our inheritance. Soon, it will be gone.
What shall we
do? What will you do?
Peter J. Roberts
A
nail in the coffin of Western Civilization-the
news of Paris Hilton's release from jail
made
page one of the New York Times web site, 8:26 a.m. on June 26, 2007.
Another
nail in the coffin of Western Civilization
No
more Schaefer Beer at the Dutch Tavern. The Wall Street Journal may be
next.
"Schaefer,
is the ,one beer to have when your having more than one. Schaefer, pleasure,
doesn't fade even when your thirst is done. The most rewarding flavor in
this man's world -- for people who are having fun. Schaefer, is the, one
beer when your having more than one."
A
buck and a half is what a 16 oz. Schaefer draft goes for at the Dutch Tavern on
Green Street in New London. At least until the last keg is dry. We watched
the last keg being delivered the other day and for all we know, it may be empty
now.
New
Yorkers of a certain age know Schaefer even if they don't drink beer. Schaefer
IS THE one beer to have when you’re having more than one…But not any
more.
First
brewed in New York in 1841 and at one time one a leading sellers of beer
in the world, the brand has been peddled and, if you will, watered-down to the
point of vanishing, which it is. The company closed its brewery in New
York in 1976-the bicentennial no less-and was bought by the Stroh Brewery Company. Then just before the turn of the century
Stroh was purchased by the Pabst Brewing Company. While still
making Schaefer Beer, Pabst was itself purchased by Miller
Brewing Company which was, in 2002 merged with the South African Breweries
forming something called SABMiller
It is a huge, multinational company headquartered in London.
We
don't expect to understand this history, only its ramifications to us.
Someone, perhaps sitting in front of a computer in London has decided that
instead of a Schaefer draft at the Dutch, we should drink a Miller or a
Pabst. That same person we suspect, has never heard Schaefer
IS THE one beer to have when you’re having more than one. We of
course are the lesser for the loss, but at least we know what we're
missing. That chap in London will never know the simple, grand glories
he's stolen.
And
to make matters worse, not only is The Wall Street Journal, a great newspaper
with an editorial policy that sends our blood pressure into the stratosphere,
in the cross hairs of Rupert Murdoch but it is raising its price to the
price of a draft at the Dutch. This fifty percent increase may well mean
that the owners of the tavern, who provides newspapers to customers, may well
stop buying the Journal. Since we are not of a mind to shell out our
money to support either the Journal or Mr. Murdoch, we may have to travel to
the library to read it, where beer of any kind is not served. Or we may just
have do without.
It
may be good for our blood pressure.
Meanwhile,
the Schaefer song on YouTube.
Yes, we plan to have more than one today.
Past
Page One News and Views
We
attended the wake for our friend's son but were unable to attend the Mass on
Friday. The huge crowd at on both days was a testament to the young man
and fortunately, there were no protests or other disturbances. There was
only much pride and grief.
To
honor one of the fallen-First Lieutenant Keith Neil Heidtman
Calling
hours will be held on Thursday, June 7, 2007, at the Norwich
Free Academy Alumni Gymnasium from 6 to 9 p.m. A Mass of Christian Burial
will be celebrated on Friday, June 8, 2007 at the Cathedral of Saint Patrick in
Norwich at 10 a.m. with a burial service to follow at the St. Joseph Cemetery
in Norwich.
The family requests that in lieu of flowers,
donations be made in memory of Keith Heidtman to The
Hole in the Wall Gang Camp at 555 Long Wharf Drive, Department W, New
Haven, CT, 06511 (203-772-0522).
Today
we bought the newspaper and came close to crying.
Among
the 127 service members killed in Iraq in May was 1LT Keith Neil Heidtman
from Norwich, Connecticut. He had been in Iraq since December and
we well remember when he arrived. His father told us. His
father is a friend of ours and was very proud of his son for graduating from
flight school and becoming an Army officer.
We
spoke often about his son last fall and winter as he was learning the ropes of
Army life in preparation for deploying to the war. As the days and
weeks passed, he would keep us up on the news from the front. He was
worried about his son so we tried to reassure him, based on our experience in
the Army and from what we knew about the fighting there, that ground troops
were often in more danger than what we called the "bird men" in helicopters.
We
were wrong. First Lieutenant Heidtman's helicopter was shot down on May
28, killing him and his copilot, Chief Warrant Officer Theodore U. Church.
We
had all sorts of things we were going to do today but we're not going to
do any of them. We're trying to deal with a loss of someone we didn't
know and try to understand the grief of a man we hold dear. We have
no words of comfort that will ease his pain. We have no way of
understanding the loss he suffers. We would like to scream.
First
Lieutenant Keith Neil Heidtman, United States Army, was 24 years old when he died. Twenty-four.
Peter
Roberts
May
31, 2007
While
America had its picnics, parades and a day off from the usual responsibilities,
the tragic adventure in Iraq continues. May 2007 is the 2nd deadliest
month for our service members since the war began in March 2003.
We've
only listened to Mr. Imus briefly when he was inflicted on us by others, but
even with this very limited exposure we were not surprised by his
comments.
He
may think he is not a racist but if enough people tell you it's raining, you'd
better grab your umbrella. The sad thing is that he has plenty of company
in the media and it took a racial attack on some young and extremely gifted
college students at one of the nation's most selective university to bring out
the distain for Mr. Imus and other so called shock jocks. Millions of
others who've not been in the spotlight of a national basketball championship
game, feel the brunt of these kind of comments, and worse, everyday. No,
we're not surprised. While we'd like to think that this may bring an end
to such behavior, we know better. These people, and the companies that
employ them, make too much money from Americans who find their programs
entertaining.
The news of late is the number of Americans who are losing
their homes in foreclosure.
The
lending practices of many banks and financial institutions have become
newsworthy for some of the practices that many employed, especially in the sub
prime market. Brokers used the principle of greed to entice
people into taking on loans that they simply could not afford to repay.
They made the assumption that real estate values would continue to rise and
that should the borrower have difficulty in repaying the ever increasing
payments, a quick sale would bail them out. The commission for the
broker was paid upfront and for many, was the over riding reason for making the
loan. Learn more at the Center
for Responsible Lending.
It is an eye-opener.
The War in Iraq is now in its
fourth year. What, we ask, have we gained and what have we
learned? Hubris comes to mind as does the concept of tragedy.
This old
soldier has had enough of the hubris and the tragedy.
Peter J. Roberts
Looking for some good work
from this administration.
We're pining for the days when gas was just
two bucks a gallon and we could turn the lights on without worrying about the
electric bill. We were fortunate in that when our Army years were over,
all thirteen of them, we left the service in better shape than when we
entered. And the few times we required health care in the Army, it
was first rate. Sadly, the shame of the Walter Reed Medical Center is not
just confined to this institution but is, according to all too many reports, a
low standard that is maintained at many military and VA facilities.
Lewis Libby, the chief of staff for Vice
President Dick Cheney was just convicted of lying to the FBI, among other
things. This act and the cover-up that had to have been
orchestrated by the White House, is an attack on all Americans and smears what
ever honor we still may have held for house at 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue.
If you look at today's figures (March 7)
already 21 Service Members have been killed in Iraq for a war total of 3,185.
The administration has difficulty getting
ride of dead weight, but it had no trouble in ousting U.S. attorneys who were investigating
friends of President Bush. The replacements are political hacks very similar
to the folks who ran and are still running FEMA.
We could go on but that's not the
point.
Is
there anything this administration has done well?
Inquiring minds want to
know.
To
the Editor
The
passing of Arthur M.. Schlesinger,
Jr.
He was no junior in our book as we've read
most, if not all of his works. He had a passion, derived from his
studies, for the value of American liberty and freedom. He would
not accept, even during the McCarthy heydays, the idea that to disagree with
government policy was even remotely wrong. He believed that to
freely disagree was what being an American was all
about.
Yes, he was sentimental and sometimes too
romantic, but we like to think, there are worse ills to befall a scholar.
Sometimes, ideals do follow from ideas. We also like to thing we are a
better people for it. Another American scholar (Seymour Martin Lipset)
called it American Exceptionalism. Both are recently gone
now, leaving it up to us. Can we still stand on the shoulders of giants?
And if so, for how long?
Rest well Arthur, if that is
possible. You earned it.
“An
Inconvenient Truth” BEST
DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
Good
for them and Al Gore too.
Well,
it seems that now, when China
has a sneeze, Wall
Street gets a
cold. But the real wonder for everyone with a dollar or two, when
will they ask us to pay up. Have you looked at the balance of trade
between the two of us lately? That's when we'll get pneumonia.
Passed.
Send a thank note to your member of congress.
Resolved by the House of
Representatives (the Senate concurring), That-- (Introduced in House)
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to
deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq
.
Resolved by the House of
Representatives (the Senate concurring), That--
(1) Congress and the American
people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States
Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq
; and
(2) Congress disapproves of
the decision of President George W. Bush announced on January 10, 2007, to
deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq
.
We
just got our electric bill from Connecticut Light & Power. We
keep our place at a comfortable, just above freezing temperature and have been
known to wander in the dark for fear of actually turning a light on, but the
good folks at CL&P want $218.76
on March 7th or they will
nick us for interest. Well, we are eating way too much
anyway. The cats should find more mice. Maybe they will
share. No, they are cats and we're staff.
But
thanks anyway, President Bush. Great energy policy.
A
report from Iraq from an anxious dad over lunch.
We
were at the Dutch Tavern in downtown the other day when a friend whom we've not
seen in a while came in for lunch. He works for the State of Connecticut
(retiring in 53 weeks, but who's counting?) and has a son in the Army.
Last summer he passed flight school and the crisp, young First Lieutenant
reported for duty in Iraq in December. The two have exchanged letters and
emails since his arrival and we obviously wanted to learn how things were
going. "All screwed up!"
was the succinct appraisal passed on to us from the twenty-two year old pilot.
Our
friend went on to explain how huge and diverse the country was-an aspect we
just don't seem to "get" over here and how, as was the case in
Vietnam, a soldier never could be really sure if an Iraqi was friend or
foe. We touched, but only briefly, on the increase of downed
aircraft and how worried he has become. His son is stationed about thirty
miles outside Bagdad and has been spared, thus far, from some of the most
intense fighting. He knows well the aircraft his son flies so is
filled with a mix relief and sorrow when he learns of another bird shot down,
but not the kind his son pilots.
He
did mention that the First Lieutenant was now wearing the double-bar, rail road
tracks of a Captain. Having spend many years in the Army, we know that
quick, company grade promotions, while not of the question, are unusual,
especially for a newly minted, First Lieutenant. Well, it seem the Army
is short of captains and rushed promotions are becoming the norm in the lower
officer grades. A news search provided more evidence that the services,
especially the Marines and Army, are having greater difficulty in keeping good,
junior officers. These are the ones who, if they stay in and
survive, will provide the brains and leadership for the services in the years
to come. If they go, and thousands have done so already, one has to
wonder what our military will be like in the years to come.
We
can't blame them for leaving and we hope the new captain, and the many others
like him, does well by and for his troops. Yes, in the scheme of things,
an early promotion might not mean too much. But if so many were not
confined to Mr. Bush's stupid war, we and our friend, would not have to worry
about such matters.
What
have we done and are we too late?
From
The Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change issued on February 2, 2007.
Most
of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th
century is very
likely
due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.
This is an
advance
since the TAR’s conclusion that “most of the
observed warming over the last 50 years is
likely
to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations”.
Discernible human
influences
now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming,
continental-average
temperatures,
temperature extremes and wind patterns.
Snow
cover is projected to contract. Widespread increases in thaw depth are
projected over most
permafrost
regions.
•
Sea ice is projected to shrink in both the Arctic and Antarctic under all SRES
scenarios. In some
projections,
Arctic late-summer sea ice disappears almost entirely by the latter part of the
21st century.
•
It is very likely that hot extremes, heat waves,
and heavy precipitation events will continue to become more
frequent.
•
Based on a range of models, it is likely that future tropical cyclones
(typhoons and hurricanes) will become
more
intense, with larger peak wind speeds and more heavy precipitation associated
with ongoing increases
of
tropical SSTs.
So,
what do we do now?
We
remember four years ago, when few of us knew, with any real precision, where
Iraq was or the various religious and ethnic groups that made up the
country. But even then there was those among
us who warned all who were willing to listen that the proposed invasion of Iraq
was not only wrong but wrong headed. Their arguments ranged from a
knowledge of the deep divisions within Iraq to an understanding of the
shortcoming within our own military to deal with the long term problems of
securing this huge, diverse country. With a few prominent
exceptions in Washington and elsewhere, their warning when unheeded, until now.
We
just returned from an early morning meeting. There were about a dozen of
us sitting at a long table in the Parish Hall of our church. The meeting
was about running the breakfast program here in New London that helps to feed
the homeless and poor here in our city. This morning's breakfast had just
been served to around 55 people and the discussions was about how the program
is run and who, among a number of volunteer organizations, should do
what. It was an organizational meeting dealing with goals and budgets but
what went unsaid was the real reason for the meeting; it was about feeding
people. Each was dealing with the here and now of getting food to
people who need to eat and each was compiling in their own minds, the
practicalities of doing just that. We could easily grasp the need and our
parts in finding solutions.
Down
in Washington they are doing a lot of taking about the wisdom of sending more
troops to Iraq. It is almost like watching a chess game; each side trying
to control the center while not exposing their king to attack or checkmate.
The president's game plan moves Army units like so many pawns, hoping to serge
past the opponents rooks and bishops and, if not to win the game, at least force a
stalemate. This is the best we're shooting for, stalemate.
There
seems to be little any of us can do about this foolishness. We thought
that the election might bring him around but it didn't. We thought the
deaths of 3,000 American Service members would make him and them stop, but it
didn't. More thousands are packing up from Bagdad. We had
hoped that maybe, just maybe, the billions spend on the war would make some of
them pause to take stock. But it hasn't.
So
for now, we're going to concentrate on feeding people who are hungry
here. It is something we can do. It's cracking eggs early in the
morning and a short prayer before everyone starts eating. A prayer
that says simply, make them stop. It is all we can do now.
Peter
J. Roberts
And
the difference between a "surge" and an "escalation"
is...?
Surge-a
strong, wavelike, forward movement, rush, or sweep: the
onward surge of an angry mob.
Escalation-to
increase in intensity, magnitude, etc.: to
escalate a war; a time when prices escalate.
According
to reliable sources, (We've always been fond of that term. Sources
that are unreliable, simply can't be trusted.) the president will announce
this week a new, improved strategy for the war in Iraq. The plan, if
that is the correct word, will include increasing the numbers of
American service members in the war area, especially in and around Baghdad. The increase has been tagged for popular
consumption as a "surge" in troop levels, suggesting metaphorically,
something that is both overwhelming-leveling all in its path-and brief.
We've
been down this road before. Back
in the last part of the most recent, expired century, the country was also
in a war that was not going well, at least from our standpoint.
During the Vietnam war and under the watchful eyes of presidents Johnson and
Nixon, we didn't have a surge or surges. We had a series of
"escalations" to the number of troops we sent to the was.
Each such escalation-and there were many-was coupled with an announcement
by the president of other spokesperson that we were turning the corner in
the war and that we could see the light at the end of the tunnel.
Just a few more troops were all that was necessary.
Does
this sound familiar?
Does
the Editorial Board of The Wall Street Journal read The Wall Street
Journal?
Two
items on page one of the January 5, 2007 edition of The Wall Street
Journal caught our eye. The first had a photograph of a teenage
boy helping a man in a wheelchair. The story had a dateline of Paulding, Ohio
with the heading...Young Caregivers: Parents turn to
children for help
It
reported on one young man, and tens of thousands of others, who is caring for his
53 year old father who has MS. The young man balances going to high
school and all that entails, with providing nearly constant care to his
father. His working mother's income is far too modest to afford
professional health care for his ill Dad. As
the report makes all too clear, this young man's story is not unique and
is replicated thousands of times all across the country. More worrisome,
the report notes that as our population continues to age, the number of
young family members taking on the primary duties of caregivers to aging
parents will grow.
The
second report was above the fold, also on page one headed with...Bush will seek aid ,
jobs funds to bolster Iraq
The report details the
expected surge in the numbers of American military serving in Iraq with an
increase in economic aid, expected to cost Americans additional billions, over
and above the hundreds of billions already spent in the country.
Coincidently, we've just updated our
directory of members from New England in the new, 110th Congress.
While we suspect the members of the editorial board of The Wall Street
Journal, who've been and are now, keen supporters of the war in Iraq, see no
conflict between these two reports in their newspaper, others may
disagree. You might ask your member of congress what they
think. Click the link below and find out.
Members
of the 110th Congress from New England
Got fifty bucks
for breakfast?
People need to eat.
This time of year we're all hearing about lots of holiday meals being
served to our nation's hungry, which is a good thing. But
people need to eat all year long and as we've all been told from day one,
breakfast is the most important meal of the day.
So in December 2005 some
people here in New London started serving free breakfasts to the region's
homeless, working poor and others who just needed a hot meal at the start
of the day. More than 10,000 breakfasts later, the program called New
London Breakfasts is in its second year.
Depending on the time of
year, the weather and the job market an average of sixty people-older men
and women, young families, kids getting ready for school-show up for
breakfast at 7 in the morning at New London's First Congregational
Church. The meals are prepared and served by volunteers and it
costs about fifty dollars a day to operate.
Last year New London
Breakfasts received donations and grants to pay for the food but this year
they are looking to others for financial help. They are asking
people to Pick a Day in 2007 to
sponsor a breakfast. Sponsors can honor a loved one, parent or
friend, celebrate a birthday or anniversary or just send in fifty bucks
with the sure knowledge that they are helping others eat a good mean at
least for one day in 2007.
If you'd like to sponsor
a breakfast in 2007, and we hope you do, send your check and the day you
wish to sponsor to;
New
London Breakfasts
First
Congregational Church
66
Union Street
New
London, CT 96320
Gerald Ford said he was a
"Ford not a Lincoln" and he was right. But the two men,
while certainly different, did share a commonality in our history.
Lincoln arrived in Washington at exactly the right time to save our
country. Lesser men, and there were many who could have been
president in 1861, could not have saved the republic as he
did.
Gerald Ford came to the
presidency, like Lincoln, at exactly the right time to save, if not our
country, then at the very least, our faith in the republic and our
democracy. He provided a dose of candor and honesty to
government that had for so long been absent. He was for America and
Americans, even when we disagreed with him, exactly what we needed at the
time. Lesser men would have used this moment in history for
their own purposes. This President Gerald Ford did not do and
for that, we are grateful.
Yes, he was no Lincoln
but he was a darn good Ford.
We ran
across the following on to
fiddle while Rome burns
To do something
trivial and irresponsible in the midst of an emergency; legend has it that
while a fire destroyed the city of Rome, the emperor Nero played his
violin, thus revealing his total lack of concern for his people and his
empire.
The president is
continuing to hold talks on the way forward in Iraq. He had meetings
with experts on the military strategy , foreign policy, domestic and
global security and national political leaders. Although it
was reported that he was going to address the nation sometime before
Christmas on changes to what this nation is doing in Iraq, this address is
to be given sometime after the start of the new year.
This delay,
already four years and thousands of deaths too late, is just more
fiddling. An exit from this disastrous war will be difficult
but it will be made more difficult the more it is delayed.
Stop fiddling Mr.
Bush. Crank up the ships and jets and bring them
home.
Is he
the worst president?
Among the things
historians and other pundits do this time of the year, is to speculate on
what future historians and pundits will say about us and our
times. In recent years they concentrated their crystal ball
reading on the mundane subjects like the state of the economy, popular
culture, information overload and the decline of bowling leagues (no
kidding), this year's hot topic is where future historians will rank the
presidency of Mr. Bush.
The Washington Post,
among other publications, asks the question, indirectly but bluntly, if
the Bush Presidency will rank as the worst in American
history. While many observers cling to the old lifesaver by
simply saying..."it's too soon to say" others keep a more steady
hand at the helm and chart a direct course to..."yes, the worst
president, ever."
We'll not pretend to
match the academic credential of professional historians or the credence
given to many pundits. Our air is much less rarified.
But we do note with not just a little tragic pleasure, that simply asking
the question..."Is he the worst president?", regardless of what
others may say in the future, is indictment
enough.
We think this letter sent
to the New York Times on November 26, accurately reflects what we all know
to be true, save for the president.
To the Editor:
The conflict in Iraq has
regressed from civil war to anarchy.
James L. Joseph
Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
As we do
every Thanksgiving Weekend, for we have much to be thankful for.
By the President of
the United States of America.
A Proclamation.
The year that is drawing
towards its close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields
and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed
that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have
been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail
to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to
the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war
of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign
States to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved
with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected
and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of
military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the
advancing armies and navies of the Union. Needful diversions of wealth and
of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defence,
have not arrested the plough, the shuttle or the ship; the axe has
enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron
and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than
heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste
that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and the
country, rejoicing in the consiousness of augmented strength and vigor, is
permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.
No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these
great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while
dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.
It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly,
reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by
the whole American People.
I do therefore invite my
fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are
at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and
observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and
Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I
recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him
for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble
penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His
tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or
sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably
engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to
heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be
consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace,
harmony, tranquillity and Union.
In
testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the
United States to be affixed.
Done
at the City of Washington, this Third day of October, in the year of our
Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence
of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.
By the
President: Abraham Lincoln
William
H. Seward,
Secretary of State
Keep
him right where he is, as a poster child.
A man we know was very
happy with the results from the election. A keen political observer
and an unabashed liberal, he also observed that with the democrats now in
control of congressional committees, with their oversight duties and new
found subpoena powers, it will be tempting to "go after" the
president and his hearty band of incompetents.
He rejected
this approach as too petty, despite what was done to President Clinton and
the country by many of the same men and women who would now face such scrutiny.
"Think in terms of 2008 and leave Bush and the rest right where they
are for all to see," his said. "Hold them up as examples
and let the people decide, as they did on election day, that they really
don't want to go down this road again."
The
bell will ring today, slowly and reverently, from the tower of First
Church in New London. The
bell's long cord, perhaps three hundred feet long, will be pulled at the
eleventh hour of this the eleventh day of the eleventh month. At
this time in 1918 the Great War stopped and the killing ended.
We used to call it Armistice Day because it was thought that the "war
to end all wars" would not be followed by others. But other
wars did follow and so we call today Veterans Day. We will
ring the bell to honor these veterans, living and dead, and to remind
ourselves how foolish we've been.
While
most of the people we supported in the election won, a few came up
short. But on the plus side, we are looking forward to January 2007
when the Congress is called to order by the Speaker of the House, Nancy
Pelosi. .A
number to think about today, election day.
As we
write these words, the counter below on this page continues to tick off.
The
numbers always increase. Every day, every week, every month and
every year for the last three years the numbers keep going up. They
note the confirmed American
Service Members Killed in Action or Wounded in Action in the war in
Iraq.
As you
enter the voting booth on today and pull the curtain so no one can see
how you vote, give a thought to the nearly three thousand Americans who no
longer are concerned with the sorry spectacle that is our
election. You may want to dwell on the tens of billions wasted in
Iraq or the graft or the incompetence of the men and women who started
this war, but we ask you, in all humility, that you think of them, the men
and women who were sent there. And
we hope you will vote for other men and women who will bring them
home.
Vote to
stop the counter.
At
least we don't have to worry about staying
the course anymore.
The latest refinement
in the administration's explanations on its policy and actions in Iraq is
that we've all been mistaken in thinking that President Bush wants us to
"stay the course" in Iraq. Evidently, nothing could be
further from the truth. According to the president's press sectary
and former Fox news broadcaster, Tony Snow, the phrase has been dropped by
the president because it left the wrong impression about the flexibly of
our presence in the country and the conduct of the war.
One
wonders if the 88 Americans Service Members killed already this
month-2,801 since the start of the war-and the upcoming elections had
anything to with the demise of the phrase.
But
what about cut
and run?
We not heard the fate of other phrase often used by the president to
describe the policies of war opponents. Let's hope they keep
it. In an age of constant change, there is much to be said for
consistency, even half-baked.
An
Observation: The
original argument for going to war in Iraq was to protect ourselves from
its weapons of mass destruction. The weapons were no where to be
found. But for many years prior to the war and right up to the
present, North Korea has shown to posses the ability and willingness to
produce a nuclear bomb and long range missiles. It now seems
that this truly crazy country has a bomb or bombs and at least some
marginal means to deliver it or them, if not now, sometime in the
future.
The
logic of this news is all too compelling. If we went to war in
Iraq because we were threatened by its nonexistent weapons, surely we
should go to war with North Korea to eliminate its weapons that are all
too real. Or perhaps not. Unlike Iraq, there's very little oil
in North Korea.
Is
it possible that we have too many guns in this country?
And
the Constitution came tumbling down...
The
Senate passed S.3930
Military
Commissions Act of 2006. The relatively short document gives
sweeping powers to the president, it our case President Bush, and takes
away many legal restraints and safeguards that we have come to expect from
our legal system. In point of fact, if it becomes law, which seems
likely, any president will have the power to detain anyone for any length
of time simply on his belief that the detainment is justified for the security
of the country. It gives remarkable latitude to the use of torture,
gives the military unrestrained power over detainees and protects civilian
and military persons from later legal review.
Our
republic is over.
Two
items on the science front
While
most political advertisers are ever so happy that we no longer have any
real regulation with regard to "truth in advertising," thus
giving them a free hand to inflict any lie or tortured truth on the
American electorate, there is some good news.
Spirit
and Opportunity are still chugging along on the Martian landscape, long
past the time when they were due to expire, and sending back some
wonderful photographs of the Red Planet. Take a look at the NASA
Mars Exploration Site, for the latest photos. Your tax dollars
well spent.
And on a
less than happy note,
We
conclude that global warming of more than 1°C,
relative to 2000, will constitute "dangerous" climate
change as judged from likely effects on sea level and
extermination of species. From
Global temperature change --Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
which was published on September 25. While the report is somewhat
technical, it should be read by literally everyone on the planet.
The New London Day's editorial page
received a reply from us. It concerns the independent
candidate for the US Senate from Connecticut, Joe Lieberman and his
democratic party challenger, Ned Lamont, who defeated Lieberman in the
recent party primary. We think enough of the editorial, and our
reply, to pass them on.
The
Day’s editorial, “Give a fellow being a hug” (September 23,
2006) is “tortured” in title and logic.
Senator Lieberman was a democrat. He
lost to the democrat Ned Lamont. Lieberman is now running for his Senate
seat as an independent. He has an interest in sweeping away prior party
affiliations and his positions in hope that current democrats will do
likewise on election day.
He joins other candidates-Rob Simmons,
Nancy Johnson and Chris Shays-in efforts to distance themselves from the
failures and foibles of George Bush and the Keystone Kops that run the
White House and congress. They reason that if you can’t sell success or
even simple competence, it’s time to wave the flag and look for hugs.
One waits for the next series of TV ads picturing these reformed right
wingers singing Kum-by-ah around the camp fire.
The Senator would have voters gloss over
the less than subtle issues of his support for the war in Iraq,
definitions of torture, no bid contracts, tax give-a-ways to millionaires,
the health insurance debacle, the growing list of politicians and
lobbyists headed for the slammer, a spent military near the breaking point
and a national government that suffers a Katrina-sized deficit at home and
is reviled overseas.
It is no wonder that Lieberman, Simmons,
Johnson and Shays would prefer smiles, canned TV salutes and hugs.
“Awe, let’s have a big hug,” says
Joe. To which this voter says…“No way, Joe.”
As late as November 2005, in The Wall
Street Journal, Lieberman was praising the “progress” in the war and
predicting a much smaller US military presence in Iraq “…by the end of
2006 or in 2007...” (The full text of Our Troops Must Stay can be read
at his official web site.)
When we screwed up in the Army, our
response was always…“No excuse, Sir”.
Senator Lieberman, Congressman Simmons
and other apologists for President Bush should try this frank admission to
Connecticut’s voters…I screwed up. No excuses.
Hug Joe Lieberman and Rob Simmons if you
must, but vote for Ned Lamont and Joe Courtney. Accept no compromises and
no excuses.
The man
who gave us Freedom Fries.
Another GOP leader has found the courage
to admit "mistakes" perhaps prodded by investors at the
Justice Department. Congressman Bob Ney of Ohio has
agreed to plead guilty to federal corruption charges. He faces
two years in the slammer.
Ney's connection to New England is not
as vague as one might suspect. Fond as we are of fried foods (fish
and chips) and things French (the list is too long) it was Ney who had
French-fried potatoes in the congressional cafeteria renamed to
"Freedom Fries" and suggested that other Americans do the
same. (The French government and many of the nation's people
opposed the war.) Perhaps Congressman Ney should have paid more
attention to hiding his corrupt, lavish lifestyle than the nomenclatures
of gastronomic statements.
To
which we say again...Viva La France!
So, we really do make people "disappear"
just like Argentina and any number of brutish countries run by
despots. Aren't we proud to be Americans?
Neville
Chamberlain, appeasement, and Paul Wolfowitz
The president, the vice president and
the secretary of defense have gone on the offensive to rally Americans in
support of the war in Iraq. Since there is little evidence of actual
progress in the war, let alone any solid reason to believe that our troops
will be coming home anytime soon, they've decided to attack the patriotism
of all who oppose the war. And they are going over the deep by
suggesting an that war opponents are of the same stripe who looked the
other way during the rise of Hitler and the Nazis.
Thomas E. Ricks book, Fiasco-The
American Military Adventure3 in Iraq, sheds light on where this line
of thinking first originated. We quote at length below and
suggest that this important book be read before casting a voted this
November 7.
….Some
observers of Wolfowitz speculate that another lesson he took from the
Holocaust is that the American people need to be pushed to do the right
thing because by the time the United States entered World War II it had
been too late for millions of Jews and other victims of the Nazis. Asked
about this in an interview before the war, Wolfowitz agreed, and expanded
on the thought-and himself linked it to Iraq: “I think the world in
general has a tendency to say, if somebody evil like Saddam is killing his
own people, “that’s too bad, but that’s really not my business.”
That’s dangerous, he continued, because Hussein was “in a class with
very few other-Stalin, Hitler, Kim Jong Il…People of that order of evil…tend
not to keep evil at home, they tend to export it in various ways and
eventually it bites us.”
The
analogy to Nazism gave Wolfowitz a tactical advantage in that it instantly
put critics of the defensive. If one was convinced that Saddam Hussein was
the modern equivalent of Hitler, and his secret police the contemporary
version of the Gestapo, that it was easy to see-and portray-anyone
opposing his aggressive policies as the moral equivalent of Neville
Chamberlain: fools at best, knaves at worst. So for years Wolfowitz
prodded the American people toward was with Iraq. From
Fiasco by Thomas E. Ricks published by The Penguin Press, 2006.
Copyright© Thomas E. Ricks, 2006
We'll miss Pluto but dwarfing might have advantages.
Astronomers came up with a new definition for a planet and Pluto was downgraded to a Dwarf Planet, making a total of
eight "real" planets.
Ok, it is very cold, far away and really not much more than a modest
clump of ice. It doesn't even go around the sun correctly. (Pluto
has a highly elliptical orbit, making large swings that bring it closer to
the sun during part of its very long year, with is not the norm for most
true planets in our solar system.)
It is so small and distant that it can be seen only with the most
powerful telescopes and even then it appears as just a small dot of
light. But like Mount Everest, we respected it because it was
there. We imagined ourselves passing it on some space adventure,
glancing at the last planet in the Solar System and saying to our
sidekick..."There goes Pluto. We really are on our way out-a-here
now."
But the idea of downsizing Pluto to a dwarf might open up a entirely
new mode of thinking. What about "dwarf finances"
for those of us who still have to work for a living? (Your
bank account is in "dwarf" status.) Can't get the time to
take a vacation? Take the weekend off and call it a "dwarf
vacation". Can't afford to make the full pledge to public
radio. Send them a five spot and become a "dwarf
member". After being swept by the Yankees in five games,
the Red Sox might think about become a "dwarf" baseball
team. ("We don't have to wait till next year. We're
New England's dwarf team.)
Dwarfing might even make it onto the political stage. With
the country and whole world going to heck in a hand basket, President Bush
could simply declare himself the "dwarf president" and head on
back to the ranch. We all might all be better off with a much
smaller President Bush and he'd have more time to to clear that darn
brush. A win/win for everyone.
Lemont
wins, as does Connecticut. Before
the vote, this is what we had to say about the primary.
Ned
Lemont
for Senate in the Connecticut Democratic Primary, today, August 8
...we
must now develop a sound strategy to extricate ourselves from this
nightmare of twenty-first century, American hubris.
We’ve
supported Senator Joseph Lieberman
before and if he wins the primary, we may do so again in the November
election. The Senator has a long history of supporting issues with which
we agree and while he is somewhat short of charisma, he is hard working
and has decidedly “common man” roots. He is noted for a certain amount
of whining, but as had been said, sometimes one must take the good with
sound of fingernails scraping on the blackboard.
Until a few months ago we had never
heard of Ned Lemont. Thanks to a well financed public relation and
advertising campaigns-and substantial ’grass roots’ interest-we now
know a few things about him that qualify him for our support and
representing us in the United States Senate.
Yes, Ned Lemont is wealthy, apparently
greatly so. (We wish more common people could run for office, but we think
those days are over, despite recent efforts at campaign finance reform.)
But we’ve been impressed with his consistent and long-term efforts to
give back to his community and to society at large.
His no “flash in the pan” do-gooder
but a man who believes, honestly we think, in the ideal of “noblesse
oblige” (the noble obligation). He seem to agree with with John
Kennedy, quoting from the Bible…“For
of those to whom much is given, much is required.”
And yes, on many substitutive issues,
the two candidates have much in common.
There are two important differences; the
erosion of civil liberties in America and what is supremely important in
this election, our war in Iraq, its incompetent execution and the need for
an acknowledgement that we made a grave mistake in starting this war and
we must now develop a sound strategy to extricate ourselves from this
nightmare of twenty-first century, American hubris.
The Senator from Connecticut clearly
lacks this understanding. By his words, actions and votes in the senate he
has become the “me too” man for President Bush, Vice President Cheney
and the entire lot of rightwing, flag waving, “take the hill, boys”
patriots who’ve gotten us into this miss. The senator has gone beyond
just not getting it. He is it.
We
do not know what it will take to wake him from his deep sleep, and
frankly, we are beyond caring.
Too
many lies have been said and gone unchallenged.
Too
many lives have been lost.
Too
many promising futures have suddenly ended.
Too
many “historic” moments have come and gone while we’re still
waist deep in the big muddy and the big fool says to push on.
There
is no more important issue in an election than a nation at
war. Everything else should be on the back burner.
On
this issue, and many others, Ned Lemont gets it.
We
give him our unqualified support and urge all democrats in Connecticut to
vote for Ned Lemont in the Senate primary on August 8.
Your
tax dollars at work. $202
or $406 billion Estimated
Costs of U.S. Operations in Iraq Under Two Specified Scenarios
from the Congressional Budget Office July 13, 2006. (in PDF format) The
Big Dig The
Central Artery/Tunnel Project in its final stages of construction remains
the largest and most complex highway and tunnel project in the nation's
history. There is broad input and oversight of the Project by numerous
entities, and Project managers prepare an extensive monthly report, the Project
Management Monthly (PMM), to track the $14.6 billion budget and
schedule. The PMM, the annual Finance Plan, a
timeline/schedule and other reports and publications are presented in
this Project Update section.MTA - Project Updates
An actual quote
from their web site Then
there's FEMA
Release Date: February 4, 2002
Washington, D.C. -- The director of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) announced today that the Bush Administration is asking
Congress for Fiscal Year 2003 budget authority of $6.4 billion.
George discovers
Geneva Prodded
in unequal parts by poll numbers, the upcoming elections, allies who've
had enough and the Supreme Court, the administration has decided
that we will follow the Geneva Convention with regard to the prisoners
held in Guantánamo and
perhaps other undisclosed locations around the world.
Among the prohibitions on the treatment of prisoners include; a)
violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds,
mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; (c)
outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading
treatment;
(d) the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without
previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording
all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by
civilized peoples. Read
more about the Convention
(III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August
1949. International Humanitarian Law - Third 1949 Geneva Convention
which is part of the International
Committee of the Red Cross web site.
JUST
STOP Noon
Friday-Our modest effort to protest the war in Iraq.
We're asking everyone to just stop what they are doing every Friday at
noon for sixty seconds. Sometimes, doing nothing is doing something.
As
goes Brookline....Among
the issues discussed at the 2006 Brookline,
Massachusetts Town Meeting was the following;
ARTICLE
31 To see if the Town will adopt the following resolution: A
Resolution in Support of the Impeachment of President George W. Bush
Whereas, President
George W. Bush has repeatedly violated his oath of office by failing to
uphold, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, in
particular by directing and countenancing numerous violations of the
Constitution and Laws of the United States, and by purposely misleading
the citizens of the nation so as to cause the United States to commence
war in Iraq; therefore be it
Resolved, that this Town Meeting urges our Representative in Congress to
introduce and/or support a resolution impeaching President George W. Bush;
and be it further
Resolved, that the Town Clerk send notice of the adoption of this
resolution to all members of the Massachusetts Congressional Delegation
within two weeks of its adoption.
or act on anything relative thereto.
The
results of the vote can be seen here at Town of Brookline.
The measure
passed.
Did
you make the call
to Aunt Millie?
President Bush and his agents want to know.
THE COUNTRY'S IN THE VERY BEST OF HANDS
|